A Melman Minute

By: Leonard Melman


May 6, 2008  

 

It has certainly been more pleasurable to look at the morning metals’ prices the past few days than has been the case earlier, and this morning is no exception with gold once again above $880 per ounce (all figures US$), silver up about thirty cents to near $$17.00 and platinum above $1,950, seemingly headed to above $2,000 once again. Base metals markets are also higher, with zinc behaving particularly well.

However, the “really big” news is coming from the petroleum markets where the price of crude is now near $122 per barrel! Despite all the warnings from the petroleum bears of an imminent bust in the price of petroleum, each selling wave is quickly overcome and prices for that widely-used commodity simply move on to new record high territory.
 


The sheer, relentless power of the petroleum move is illustrated by the long-term chart on Crude which places these counter-sell offs in the proper perspective, namely as interruptions within an ongoing and powerful bull market, the implications of which are enormous. If one were to draw a curved line connecting the lows of 1998, 2001 and 2007, it would be clearly seen that the curvature of the line was steadily accelerating - and that all the action of the petroleum markets was taking place ABOVE that line. In our interpretation, that does not speak of a market which is peaking and ready to retreat substantially. Instead, it appears to us that the petroleum market is gathering strength over time.

It is also worth noting that this petroleum bull market is no “flash-in-the-pan”, having lasted for almost ten years and having advanced from just under $12.50 per barrel to almost $125 per barrel - a magnitude of ten times the originating price.

As crude rises, so does the price of gasoline, which is now just under $4.00 per gallon in many parts of America and well over five dollars per U.S. gallon across Canada. For millions of motorists, driving is much more a necessity than a luxury, as huge numbers of people either live in distant suburban areas or rural, remote areas, neither adequately serviced by public transportation, leaving their automobile or pickup as the only effective means of commuting to work and taking care of essential family needs. With their expenditures for gasoline rising rapidly, simple mathematics can demonstrates that as those costs rise, the money available for every other expenditure diminishes, thereby putting additional pressure on important consumer discretionary purchases.

There is yet another fact to consider. If all that money was spent in the domestic economy, particularly in the United States, it could be economically demonstrated that the net effect on the economy might be neutral as the recipients of the petroleum funds would simply disburse them back into the nation’s economy. However, since America imports about fourteen million barrels of oil per day - now at a cost of about $1.7 billion per day or over $600 billion per year - those are funds moving out of the country into foreigners’ hands. While those foreigners may indeed use those monies to buy U.S. government debt or to purchase interests in major American corporations, it can readily be seen that America is steadily ceding increments of control over their own domestic affairs, both social and economic, into foreign hands. In our view, that cannot help but weaken the internal strength of that nation over time. In turn, that growing weakness, should it develop as we anticipate, would likely lead to distortion in the international economic and security systems, and those uncertainties, over time, could become factors in future golden bull markets.

In the meantime, mining shares are beginning to perform better over the past few days, but it is important to view these improvements in context. While the XAU has indeed recently advanced by ten percent, from about 163 to 179, when viewed on the one year chart, that advance does not appear to reverse any important trends, but merely serves to bring the index back into the bottom part of the trading range which has held for most of 2008.
 


One of the most interesting areas of mining investments during the past few years has been the field of uranium exploration and development. As the fundamental case for uranium became public knowledge, a veritable frenzy took place among mining companies to become involved in the acquisition and development of uranium holdings. As recently as early 2004, very few such companies, other than a very few well-known producers, were involved in any way in uranium development.

However, once the investment public became aware of the case for uranium, the situation changed dramatically as literally hundreds of junior mining concerns added uranium holdings to their overall property portfolios and new entities specifically focusing on uranium development came into being. In the meantime, the price of uranium shot skyward, rising from under $10.00 per pound to over $130 at its peak, feeding the frenzy. The share price of many of these companies, both producers and newer exploration/development entities, literally shot skyward.

The case for uranium, simply put, noted that new uranium production was insufficient to match current usage at the world’s present nuclear producing plants and the number of new plants on the drawing boards of nations such as China and Japan would surely exacerbate that shortfall. In addition, the recovery of fuel-grade uranium from weapons left over from the “Cold War” era was becoming increasingly unreliable. One other important factor in the uranium equation was the production of power generated by nuclear plants was pollution-free, since it did not involved the burning of fossil fuels such as coal or oil.

About eighteen months ago, the situation began to change dramatically and uranium mining share quotes, on average, began a severe and protracted decline. It soon became apparent that it would be many years before any of these new developments actually achieved production. Then the price of uranium itself began to fall, now sitting just under $70.00 per pound. And, recently, environmental opposition to uranium development began to harden following a period when it appeared that the pollution-free aspect of nuclear power production might actually make them advocates of such developments.

And now, in the past few days, the Province of British Columbia has just placed a moratorium on any nuclear exploration and development, reversing an apparent policy by the B.C. government of only one year earlier which indicated uranium development would be possible.

One interpretation is that the provincial Liberal Party, now in power, is courting “Green” movement support for the upcoming provincial election. Another interpretation is that, in courting such support, the province of British Columbia will turn back toward the days when the Ministry of Mines functioned as the “Ministry of No-Mines.”

Once again, this episode demonstrates the vulnerability of mining to government actions, whether foreign or domestic.


 

  Previous Minute                                                                                                        Next Minute  ►

   

DISCLAIMER


The information presented above is based on data which we believe to be from reliable sources, but the accuracy of which cannot be guaranteed.  Any opinions or predictions contained herein are those of the editor and are likewise offered also for information purposes only.

Any investment decisions should be made only following consultation with registered investment professionals.

 

 

©theMelmanReport.com - A PIPEDA Compliant Website