A Melman Minute

By: Leonard Melman


 

August 11, 2008

 

One of the most important questions regarding the markets we follow, particularly as it affects the precious metals markets, is the price of petroleum.  As anyone who follows the market knows, the price of crude soared to an astonishing (all prices US$) $147 per barrel just a few weeks ago, but has since plunged to this morning's figure near $116.

 

The financial market optimists offer the view that this sharp decline is merely the precursor to a huge correction in the price of oil which will see that price, in fact, reverse much of the ten- year bull market which has taken place since 1998's low of near $10.00 per barrel.  Should that occur, the argument goes, then inflationary pressures will subside, consumer purchasing power for other goods and services will be restored, pressure will be taken off the number of homes entering foreclosure and the balance of trade deficit for America, a goodly portion of which is related to the purchase of imported oil, will decline - taking pressure off the beleaguered U.S. Dollar.

 

We would also offer the opinion that if the optimistic side is correct, then there would be opposing influences on the precious and base metals.  The precious metals might be expected to subside in the face of lower inflation and a rising level of confidence and optimism.  However, should the consumer begin to act in a more robust manner, then the demand for base metals would likely rise as the demand for metals-related production increased.

 

Those who are more pessimistic regarding oil prices, on the other hand, point to the fact that every phase of the ten-year oil bull has been followed by a correction, and virtually every correction has been identified by some observers as the beginning of a new and major downtrend.  Some of the corrections have been moderate, but some have been severe, such as the ones that saw prices collapse from $38 to $18 in 2001 and from $78 to $50 in the second half of 2006.

 

Some observers have, in fact, compared the long-term charts of gold and crude oil, coming to the conclusion that the market action of crude in the recent era is forming a 'mirror image' to that of gold during 1980, namely a sudden and ruthless collapse from a market which had been rising vertically. 

 

Therefore, it is well worth our while to compare the two charts and form some conclusions of our own.

 

 

Please note the duration of the build-up in crude's price which preceded the strong breakout above the $40 level in early 2003.  That pattern had lasted two decades and, chart-wise, history has shown many examples of the move upward from a break-out being related to the duration of the consolidation period which preceded that breakout.  In the case of oil, the world was actually undergoing a transformation where demand was growing steadily while newly-discovered supply was beginning to diminish, altering the situation from huge over-supply to a situation where future supply problems could be foreseen.

 

 

Notice the difference for gold in the action which took place before the move above $200 in late 1978.  It was compact and had virtually no corrections along the way.  Then, instead of moving with slowly gathering momentum and several important corrections, gold rapidly accelerated its move toward the vertical and quadrupled in price within twelve months without a meaningful reversal during its vertical move.  When the rally collapsed, it did so with incredible swiftness, dropping from about $870 to $460 within just a few trading days.  Gold then spent the rest of 2000 trying to regain lost ground, formed a second top well below the first, and then went into a period lasting more than a quarter  of a century before the old high was finally exceeded. 

 

There is also another important difference.  Gold, though highly desirable and, it may be argued, essential from a monetarist point of view for the financial stability of the world, nevertheless is not an essential ingredient of day-to-day living for the multitudes.  Therefore, when the price collapsed, there was no sustainable buying which came in from users. 

 

The situation in crude is entirely different.  Oil is essential for day-to-day life and the fundamental equation regarding usage versus newly-discovered supplies continues to point to supply problems through the years.  It would appear, therefore, that there is a much higher likelihood of oil marketers taking new long positions in order to insure future supply to a much greater extent than what happened to gold when its price collapsed.

 

All of this came to mind thanks to an article in today's National Post by financial writer Claudia Cattaneo where she addresses this very question.  After pointing out that a huge difference exists between oil market bulls who not long ago were forecasting prices as high as $350 per barrel and bears who are looking for much lower prices, she offers this opinion:  "...bears' bet that oil is suddenly in reverse seems weak...Demand rose in the first half of the year, reaching 87 million barrels per day (bpd).  While OECD (economically developed nations) countries used 520,000 fewer barrels a day in the first half of the year, the rest of the world burned 1.3 million barrels more.  Most public oil and gas companies are struggling with production declines because they don't have enough projects to replace the oil they are producing...The peak in oil discoveries was in the late 1960s." (our emphases)

 

The oil question is directly relevant to prosperity in the mining industry and bears close watching.

 

Markets this morning have mostly recorded relatively small moves.  As of 8:00 AM PDT, gold, silver and platinum were moderately lower while the prices of most base metals were close to unchanged.  However, despite these quiet moves in the metals themselves, both major mining indexes have fallen by about four percent so far, continuing their downward trend.  Crude is trading near $116 per barrel, the Dow is roughly unchanged and the TSX is off by about 100 points.  Currency trading shows the U.S. Dollar Index down by 18 points and the C$ trading near 93.75 cents US..

 

 

 

  Previous Minute                                                                                                               Next Minute  ►

 
   

DISCLAIMER


The information presented above is based on data which we believe to be from reliable sources, but the accuracy of which cannot be guaranteed.  Any opinions or predictions contained herein are those of the editor and are likewise offered also for information purposes only.

Any investment decisions should be made only following consultation with registered investment professionals.

 

 

©theMelmanReport.com - A PIPEDA Compliant Website