|
January's Jobs Report was issued by
the U. S. Department of Labor right
on schedule this morning and one can
only imagine the pleasure those
numbers brought to the Obama
Administration as the election of
November 2012 draws nearer. In
short, the numbers were truly
impressive with a net new jobs gain
of 244,000 while the official
Unemployment Rate dropped to 8.3%.
The jobs gain figure was the best in
nine months while the Unemployment
Rate was the lowest in three
years.
Not surprisingly, American financial
markets surged in the first hour of
trading with the Dow posting a gain
of over 160 points by 7:30 AM PST
before some selling set in.
Despite all the renewed optimism,
there are two essential points that
should be made which might give some
pause to those who believe America
is now on the way to robust economic
growth.
First, the number is good, but is
hardly in line with past periods of
sustained, powerful economic
expansion which consistently added
upwards of 500,000 jobs per month
during strong periods. It is also
noteworthy that the number of
full-time employed Americans remains
far below levels of 2007 so the
economy is still playing catch-up.
It must also be pointed out that
much of the reduction in the
Unemployment Rate can be accounted
for by discouragement among idle
workers.
America's Unemployment Rate is
calculated by dividing the number of
job seekers by the number of active
workers. In a simplified version,
if there are 10,000,000 active job
seekers and 100,000,000 workers, the
rate would be 10%. However, if
2,000,000 former job seekers simply
get discouraged to the point where
they were no longer actively seeking
employment, then even if the number
of employed remained static, the
Unemployment Rate would decline to
8.0%.
It is our opinion at The Melman
Report that much of the improvement
in the Unemployment Rate during the
past year has been of that variety,
not the result of strong and
sustained growth in the number of
employed.
Second, there is abundant evidence
that economies around the world are
not advancing strongly and this slow
to absent economic growth worldwide
may very well put a damper on
America's future growth prospects.
A number of recent articles in the
financial media would appear to lend
substance to this theory.
In Hungary, the state-owned Malev
Airlines just announced they were
going out of business as the
Hungarian government could no longer
sustain subsidy payments at their
former level. Malev thus has become
the second European airline to fail
in recent weeks, following the path
of Spain's "Spanair". Several other
nations including Sweden, Portugal,
Poland and the Czech Republic are
also considering reducing or
eliminating airline subsidies,
thereby putting the survival of
their own domestic airlines in
jeopardy.
In Germany, IBM recently announced
that they were considering
eliminating thousands of jobs in
that country in order to curtail
excessive costs and increase net
earnings.
In America, AMR (American Airlines'
parent company) just announced they
were planning to cut about 13,000
workers - about 17% of their
workforce - in order to become more
competitive.
In Canada, the government reported
that Canada's Unemployment Rate has
just risen to the highest level in
nine months and Canadian Factory
Output declined in January.
Worldwide, the Baltic Dry Index,
which measures international
shipping rates, just fell to its
lowest level in twenty-five
years due to a combination
of increased shipping capacity
combined with slowing business
development.
And, as previously reported on these
pages, several European economies
continue to falter and unemployment
is rising rapidly in critical
nations such as Greece, Spain and
Portugal, thereby raising government
expenditures at the very same time
government revenues are declining.
So, while the 'jobs' picture in
America does look somewhat brighter
thanks to this morning's report,
many serious economic questions
remain in play and we believe a high
level of economic stimulation -
probably including additional
increments of fiat money creation -
will continue into the foreseeable
future.
Our world of precious and base
metals mining was in the news
recently and we note two interesting
articles of late; one with positive
implications for mining and one
somewhat negative.
On the positive side, Canada's
National Post recently reported that
a judge in the Yukon Territory
ruled, "...Canada's First Nations
cannot impose a modern notion of
legal rights onto promises of the
distant past to force land claims
settlements...declaring a
141-year-old government promise is
not legally binding on Ottawa
because it was absurd to contemplate
at the time that natives could sue
the government over such things."
It is important to understand that
the legal agreement involves about
three-quarters of the entire
Canadian land mass. It dates back
to 1870 when the Hudson's Bay
Company ceded the entire area known
as Rupert's Land to the government
of Canada. At that time, the
government, led by Prime Minister
John A. MacDonald declared, "...Upon
the transference of the properties
in question to the Canadian
government, the claims of the Indian
tribes to compensation for lands
required for purposes of settlement
will be considered and settled in
conformity with the equitable
principles which have uniformly
governed the British Crown in
dealings with the aboriginals."
It is that wording which was under
dispute in a battle between the Ross
River Dena tribe and Ottawa, with
the native tribe claiming it was
binding on today's government. The
judge's ruling declared that it was
not, particularly when interpreted
within the statement's historical
context.
The implications for the mining
world could be important if lawyers
are able to show that it undermines
some of the more specious claims put
forward by aboriginals through the
years.
The judge, however, did acknowledge
that his ruling was only "the first
phase of the trial in this matter'
and was likely to be appealed.
We plan to report as this legal
matter works its way through the
court systems.
The other article relates to the
South American country of Paraguay,
a country which officially has been
welcoming to the mining industry.
Unfortunately, as reported by the
American Press, the government's
policies have not altered human
behaviour and one mining company,
Latin American Minerals Inc., has
just announced they were closing
their Paraguayan gold mine project
because, "...local gold-diggers and
thieves invading and damaging the
property have made it too dangerous
to continue..."
On a personal level, I had the
opportunity to visit Paraguay last
year and was favourably impressed
with the government's efforts to
modernize the country and to attract
new industrial investments,
including mining. Unfortunately, it
appears people in the 'back country'
have yet to get the message.
This article underscores the concept
that special risks still exist while
conducting mining exploration and
production work in distant foreign
lands.
As of 9:30 AM PST, financial markets
are still higher thanks to the jobs
report with the Dow Industrials
ahead by about 150 points while
Canada's TSX Index has gained only
30, perhaps held back by weak
performance in the precious metals.
Gold has fallen by about $20 to near
$1,740 while silver is off by about
50 cents to just under $33.90. Base
metals are stronger across the board
while mining share indexes are
slightly lower on balance.
In other markets, long term interest
rates are up this morning by a sharp
.13%, but, as the above chart
clearly shows, they remain inside a
very tight trading range of
approximately 2.85% to 3.2% which
has held for several months. Crude
oil is trading quietly close to $97
per barrel while the US Dollar is
moderately stronger in currency
markets.
All quotes US$ unless otherwise
noted.
Next Melman Minute scheduled for
Monday, February 6, 2012
|